Discourse and Desires

In my previous post, I posted a picture of Teo and his friend Skot. I've seen Teo before and wondered if that was his real name. I'd be more inclined to believe it were had he not intro'd us to his friend with the weird spelling. Granted, I know a Scott who prefers Skot in writing -- but he's a dick.

Irrespective of name controversies, here are four (yes, Nathaniel -- four) vids with him. All from ChaosMen. sassy_cissa, I know you're on that one glorious (hint) LJ comm, so you may have already grabbed these.


nathaniel_hp, the Teo and Silas one is the vid that I led me to say Teo can't fuck. At least on camera. Doing it for the camera is probably way different than doing it without, even with the amateurish vids. It's also the one that gave me a unnecessarily long shot of his questionable balls. But still, he's gorgeous, they look like brother (so it satisfies that bit of perv within me), and his banter with Skot is too cute.




Oh, Teo -- how I love you and your strange ball-skin.

Now, I guess time for a poll. I have a foreskin-centered vid that I was going to post. But it's BDSM. Now the premise of the videos (non-con/dub-con) is all a ruse, but the BDSM portion is not. And more often than not, the dudes are brought to tears. Now, for some, that's the point. That the recipient responds in tears is part of the appeal for the recipient, and it surely doesn't stop them from continuing in the scene. In fact, as the tears stop, their threshold increases, and then they delve deeper into BDSM. The fact that this particular dude has done five separate videos for the company means that he certainly wasn't raped, kidnapped, and truly forced to do what he does.

Still... it's disheartening for some to see him in tears.

So the poll:Poll #1940 BDSM
Open to: All, results viewable to: All

Should the Inspirational Art Films Include BDSM?

Okay, that's it -- Enjoy, guys! I got some beta'ing to do on my day off!